
Short yellow light times at intersections have been shown to increase the number of traffic violations and accidents. Conversely, increasing the yellow light duration can dramatically reduce red-light violations at an intersection.
I'm on my way out to work, when I come home I'll try to find a study I read about yellow light duration and red light cameras. Shortening the yellow light duration is dangerous but routine for cities that install these things.
No kidding dangerous. The article links to another, "5 Proven Ways to Stop Red Light Running which notes that increasing yellow light duration as well as having a few seconds of all red greatly reduces accidents. A comment to that article came from a police officer who noted that most officers ticket for safety, not profit. I think having an actual person tell you you did something dangerous is more effective in improving road safety than being "caught" by a machine. That just turns rush hour into a live version of Frogger.
Absolutely amazing! It blows me away that anyone would mortgage public safety in the interest of pursuing traffic fines. I wouldn't be shocked to hear that the company who supplies the photoequipment (the ones who "gets a cut of the revenue" from the fines) also were the ones who made the recommendation to shorten the yellow light cycle.
The really sad part is to think of all the people who had to buy in on this idea, and that none of them spoke up against it. Start with the county treasurer, who has to bring up the idea of how to raise revenue, and bring the chain through the procurement department (they had to set up the contract for the equipment), the county council (who would have to approve the budget), all the way down to the guy they had to tell to change the timing on the light... Any one of those people could have thrown up a red flag, but none of them did.
Makes you really start to think about your own local government when you hear about things like this in other peoples.
I think having an actual person tell you you did something dangerous is more effective in improving road safety than being "caught" by a machine. That just turns rush hour into a live version of Frogger.
I like that!
Great seed Wheel.
Politicians and bureaucrats know the color of power - green. They think it is their money that you have in your pocket. They work overtime thinking of ways to take it from you.
Dr Know, I LOVE IT!!!! I think you should print this on a bumper sticker. Thanks for the laugh this morning, PRICELESS!
What turkeys, this is good to know. They essentially made it impossible to avoid being fined if you caught the yellow light wrong since many of these drivers would not have had enough time to stop.
If a few of these cities were really interested in safety they would have left the cameras up at the intersection where accidents were reduced. A few of them took them down due to profitability alone.
A few of them took them down due to profitability alone.
The city of High Point here in NC took their cameras down after a lawyer got a ticket. He investigated and found out the city was supposed to be giving the money to the school system, they weren't. The city had taken in over 2 million dollars and hadn't given the schools a dime.
He sued to force the city to give the schools the money. They took the cameras down, never did give the schools the money.
Wheel,
What a great seed. For once, useful information provided to NV readers. I am amazed that you haven't had 100 or more hits. But, I guess if you don't have politics in the seed then it won't be read.
I can't believe (oh, I guess I can) that cities would do this for financial reasons, the hell with safety eh?
Well, that's depressing and infuriating. Great seed, thanks!
The Mississippi legislature just defeated a proposal to have the cameras installed. In a state that could really use the revenues these gadgets always produce, seeing principle triumph over cash was a fine thing to watch.
Yes Virginia, there are a few places left where the voice of the people can still make a difference. Now all we have to do is watch the company that sells the contraptions so it can't do an end run around the legislature and get them installed anyway. After all, they do have good old Haley Barbour running things there. He never met a corporate ripoff he didn't like.
It's gotten to the point where some people have actively started vandalizing these cameras. Some examples are here and here. Then there is this company (commercial site), which wants to sell you a high gloss coating to make your license plate impossible to read by the flash camera. And this organization nicely summarizes why these things suck.
For a view of how the camera companies sell their product, look here. The lines that stood out to me from this site that look particularly creepy are these:
Optional configuration to measure "Speed on Green."
System can also be used to measure speed during the green and amber signal phase to catch drivers who speed through the intersection, or who speed up during the amber phase to make it though the intersection.
Public safety, my pet goat!! But if you do agree with them, to back you up, there's this campaign, that wants to spread these things everywhere. Notice that there isn't any concern about civil liberties, corrosive effects of automated enforcement vs. human enforcement, exceptional circumstances, or other valid concerns. The rise of the nanny state in America continues.....
people will claim they arent for revenue, they are to make people safer, but once they start to generate revenue, that's exactly how they will be used.
Many more city is doing it, Glendale,AZ. where they have camera the cross walk light do not blink fourteen time before the light turn red. Cross walker lights was a warning to alert you to the light would be turning red, but without blinking it has allow the city to collect more money from red lights ticket. The red lights and speeding ticket camera should be out law, you are receiving a ticket that is unfair to the city cheating on how they operated the light, profit I guess is not a dirty word.
Oh, they're sold as revenue producers. The pitch is "just look how much money we can make ripping these people off." The company that was trying to sell Mississippi on it is in Arizona. Mississippi would split the take 50/50 with them. It so has nothing to do with public safety it's not even funny. Now, there's nothing wrong with honestly acquired revenue. This doesn't qualify.
That incredible shortening of the caution light intervals for instance. What kind of a scummy individual would do something that is guaranteed to cause more accidents for money?
Money always outshouts principle. Well, almost always.
compendium of studies All showing basically the same thing. Red light camera use increases property damage and injury risk. Rear end collisions are the most commonly cited type of accident that increases markedly with the use of red light cameras.
I've seen the exact thing on other studies beginning about 10 years ago. When your city puts these in, it's a sure sign the city fathers care more about profit than the health of the citizens.
I'm overwhelmed at the response to this. Usually an article has to have, "Obama, Clinton, Evolution, Atheist or Sex" in the headline to get this much attention. :)
So your dream headline for a thousand votes would be:
Sexy Christian Barak Obama castigates Atheist Hillary Clinton for her husband's sex with a wombat?
(pictures and film at 11:00)
:)
Gee, space guy, I musta missed that story. Do you have a link, pretty please?
Believer Barack Blasts Sexy Atheist, Clinton Concurs
Space guy, how's this? Shorter, more alliterative.
Yous guys are funny.
:)
truth!
Profiteering jerks.
In Charlotte NC, the cameras were installed by none other than LOCKHEED. The revenue generated by them was split 50/50 with the city. Fishy? Criminal me thinks.
There's a little town outside Raleigh called Knightdale. It's a very small town but it has 3 redlight cameras!
People are tribal, in the old days they put their two squad cars on the roads in and out of town, then stopped the ones they didn't know as the spirit moved 'em. This just leaves them to set with one eye on Jerry Springer and the other on the traffic. It makes more time for them to eat donuts!
hay cruth it is called fascism.
Pamela,
Krispy Kreem Doughnuts are far superior to Dinky Doughnuts.
I think it goes beyond revenue. Its one more prying eye that the powers that be have into our personal lives....Big Brother does traffic enforcement.
Krispy Kreem Doughnuts are far superior to Dinky Doughnuts.
So let it be written.
it shouldn't surprise us govt cheats....its probably the biggest cheater of all
head
This is not the U.S. government, these are local governments.
governments cheat. period point blank. all governments
Hi to everyone. I'm writing from Italy. In my Country that problem is very big. The revenues of violations goes to local goverments. In many cases local judges must stopped local polices: the time of yellow lights were only 2-3 seconds: all for increase the revenues of local goverments, that in my Country has few money to makes its work. But now, the problem is that all local judges could do the same thing...
blogmasterpg,
Hello and welcome to my column. You've touched on the real problem I think. Where the revenue goes. Cities wouldn't be so quick to install these things if they didn't profit from them. The problem comes when they lowered the yellow light interval to increase the number of 'violations'. That also increases the danger to motorists.
That also increases the danger to motorists.
When faced with the prospect of making more of the almighty dollar, the safety of motorists becomes a remarkably secondary concern, I imagine.
Every time I see this headline, I feel the need to bake a pie.
Forget the shortening...just use lard.... mmmm
Uh uh! No can do - the gubmint is bannin' dem dare trans fats, doncha know?
I'm surprised that Nashville is on the list as being caught.
You would think if they were "caught" that they would have actually done something about it - yet, there is a new light near where I work, and the yellow light lasts about 2.5 seconds.
Eric,
And everyone really, this seed should keep us all aware that a camera light is more dangerous than an unmonitored intersection.
damn! Those bastards! Anything for a buck these days. It is even starting to spread to local governments. What a slick way to milk money out of people.
What a slick way to milk money out of people.
What a terrible way to put citizens lives at risk.
That too
Governments have been in this type of scam for a long time in many forms.
In Texas in the not so distant past the state government eventually passed a law placing a cap on the percent of local government revenue that can come from traffic violations. The reason was speed traps created to capture non-locals to generate most of and in some cases all of a small town's revenue. These would involve placing a speed limit sign just behind a tree or around a sharp corner then tag people right behind it for speeding. If you took it to court it was the local court where the justice of the peace is part of the scam and got a kickback.
Fast forward 40 years and we have the new version of the same scam.
They do that same kind of speed trap scam in West Virginia a lot. When I was growing up in West Virginia we knew all the little towns that had a hidden speed limit to sucker people into.
I was on my bicycle (finally!) today, and it occurred to me that shortened yellow lights could be very hazardous for a cyclist entering a busy multi-lane intersection even on a green light. One more thing to worry about, as if motorists rolling through stop signs and people taking left turns while on cell phone weren't enough. And yes, I'm a careful, considerate, non-agressive but assertive cyclist who follows the rules of the road, while keeping in mind the car always wins.
And I don't think a helmet is going to be much help to you.
Funny you mention that, since my worst bike/bus accident took place in your namesake's city (or it's twin, really).
if you read the news on GASB 45, which requires state and local governments to estimate and put on their books the liabilities they have for unfunded retiree promises, you will see that most state and local governments are bankrupt and desperate for cash....
you will see that most state and local governments are bankrupt and desperate for cash....
Just like the rest of us, but we can't cheat people out of money on tickets.
yeah, i think governments are pretty much corrupt because there is little brake on their powers...imagine what would happen to you if you could hand out tickets and collect cash.
Seattle Washington shortens yellow light interval on intersections with cameras. Money matters more that safety.
Yellow Lights are mandated to be 3.8 SECONDS, no less.
Comment # 22 links to the newest story of Seattle, where they claim 3.5 seconds.
Anything less than 3.8 is a crime, but you have to prove it to the the Court.
It's just like stealing money, whether a good cause or not, it's still stealing!
As you all are becoming aware, it's not for SAFETY, It's the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |