Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Wheel's column >>

WHEEL

As old as my gums and a little older than my teeth.
Articles Posted: 43  Links Seeded: 1095
Member Since: 5/2006  Last Seen: 5/17/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Illegal Closure of the Gaza Strip: Collective Punishment of the Civilian Population.pdf

Seeded on Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:09 AM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: pchrgaza.org
world-news, israel, palestine, gaza, apartheid, iof, israeli-occupation-force, pchr, collective-punishment
Seeded by Wheel
Advertise | AdChoices

From 1949 until 1967 the Gaza Strip was under Egyptian rule.
During those years it was possible to travel by train or by car from
Cairo to Gaza through the Sinai Peninsula; traveling to and from
Gaza was subject to a permit issued by the Egyptian security
authorities. The Gaza Strip was declared a closed military area in
1967, following the Israeli military occupation, and travel out of
the Strip became dependent on the approval of the Israeli military
commander. In 1982, when Israeli troops withdrew from the Sinai
peninsula, the Rafah crossing was opened under Israeli control.2
Over time it became increasingly difficult to obtain a permit to
cross Erez, and since 2000 it has been virtually impossible for the
overwhelming majority of Palestinians to obtain a permit to cross
the Israeli border.3 Thus the Rafah border with Egypt has long been
the only practicable – if remote – possibility to travel out of Gaza.
Following the September 2005 disengagement of Israeli forces from
the Gaza Strip – which also removed the Israeli military presence
from the Egyptian-Palestinian border – on 15 November 2005
Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) signed the Agreement
on Movement and Access (AMA). The agreement was mediated
by the US and the EU. Egypt is not a party to agreement nor was
it an official party to the negotiations (although it participated in
the works). According to the AMA: "Rafah will be operated by the
Palestinian Authority on its side and Egypt on its side, according
to international standards". The PA's work, on the Palestinian side
of the border, is placed under the supervision of the EU.
On paper, the AMA was intended to "give the Palestinian people
freedom to move, trade, live normal lives" and to grant the PA
control over entry and exit from its territory.4 However, contrary to
the declarations, the agreement was never properly implemented,
and the PA was not allowed control over exit and entry from and
into the Gaza Strip. Israel continued to exert its control over the
operation of the Rafah crossing in a number of ways:

i. The crossing was frequently closed by Israel due to incidents
unrelated to the crossing itself; following the capture of the
Israeli soldier Shalit, on 25 June 2006 Israel closed the Rafah
border. In that year, until June 2007 when the agreement was
indefinitely suspended, Rafah was closed for 265 days.
ii. Crossing through Rafah is only permitted for holders of
Palestinian IDs, i.e. individuals registered in the Palestinian
population registry.
iii. Through its control of the Palestinian population registry,
Israel continues to indirectly determine who is allowed to
cross Rafah (many residents of Gaza have been unable to
obtain IDs and so cannot travel);
iv. Israel retained the power to prevent the passage of Palestinians
on the basis of "security grounds" and to veto the passage of
foreigners.5 In principle foreigners (i.e. not carrying Palestinian
ID or passport) are not allowed to enter Gaza through Egypt
but need to obtain an Israeli entrance visa and Israeli permit
to cross Erez. The agreement lists exceptional categories of
foreign nationals allowed to enter the Gaza Strip through
Rafah: diplomats, foreign investors, employees of international
organizations, humanitarian workers and foreign journalists.
With regard to such travelers, according to the terms of the
AMA, the PA must inform Israel in advance: it is Israel that de
facto makes the final decision on the entry to Gaza through the
Rafah crossing of these categories of persons.
In June 2007 Israel announced the freezing of the crossing agreement.
Since June 2007 the people of Gaza have been effectively denied access
to the outside world both from Erez and Rafah crossings. Although
since June 2010 the Egyptian authority has declared the opening of the
Rafah crossing, traveling to and from Egypt remains an exceptional
case for the local population. In fact the coordination with the Egyptian
authorities, which was already difficult in the past, became de facto
impossible after 2007 and it continues to be almost impossible to travel
without some sort of "special coordination" (i.e. personal connection). Cars
are not allowed to cross the Rafah border. This affects patients traveling for medical reasons, who are often in very serious health conditions, as all travelers have to cross as pedestrians organized in a complex and inconvenient system of collective buses.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Wheel's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Activism, Anti-War, Islamic Scholars, Israel-Palestine Peace, Liberal Atheists, Palestine - The Holy Land, Peace in Palestine, Political Analysis, Question Authority, race and ethnicity
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (23)
Wheel

The report for 2010. Interesting read.

  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:10 AM EST
Son of Abraham

Since the offensive, in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1860 (2009), Israel has failed to open the borders of Gaza, thus impeding the passage of goods necessary for recovery and reconstruction. By imposing this draconian closure policy – and not lifting it in the aftermath of the military operation - Israel has manufactured a chronic and profound humanitarian crisis.

The Israeli regime is failing again in adhering to the United Nations resolutions, a trade mark for the rogue state of Israel.

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:01 PM EST
Son of Abraham

Israel's unilateral imposition of a growing "buffer zone" all along the Gaza borders, as a "no-go area" implemented with open fire, currently renders 17% of Gaza territory or 35% of its agricultural land not accessible or accessible only under high risk of being shot by Israeli military forces. At sea, Israel allows fishing only out to 3 nautical miles, despite the limit of 20 nautical miles established under the Oslo Accords. This has further drastically negatively impacted upon the agricultural and fishing sector on which thousands of families depend economically.

Nothing is expected from the Israeli regime, but unilaterally deciding on its borders with disregard to agreements and the International Law and International Community standards.

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:09 PM EST
Wheel

Something interesting to note here. When the PCHR makes a claim, they back it up. Check the footnotes and you will find links to relevant sections of international law that apply to Gaza blockade and clearly delineate Israel's responsibility as the occupying nation.

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:22 PM EST
curious3Deleted
Reply
Son of Abraham

The International Committee of the Red Cross clearly stated that:

"The whole of Gaza's civilian population is being punished for acts for which they bear no responsibility. The closure therefore constitutes a collective punishment imposed in clear violation of Israel’s obligations under international humanitarian law."

Collective punishment is Internationally Outlawed.

For a country that keeps claiming that it is the only liberal and democratic place in the Middle East, Israel is defiantly going through self-delusional times more than ever, and at the same time deluding the world of that highly exaggerated and misleading piece of information. However, that is not something new to Israel, the country that portrays above the international law and United Nations Security Council resolutions; as dozens of resolutions are in the standby status for Israel to conform to them.

  • 6 votes
Reply#2 - Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:09 PM EST
Wheel

I started the seed with that bit about the Egyptian crossing because the zionists so often try to cower behind the flaccid excuse that "Egypt is doing it too." Well, not so much:

Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) signed the Agreement
on Movement and Access (AMA). The agreement was mediated
by the US and the EU. Egypt is not a party to agreement nor was
it an official party to the negotiations

Egypt had NO say in the original agreement.

it is Israel that de facto makes the final decision on the entry to Gaza through the
Rafah crossing of these categories of persons.
In June 2007 Israel announced the freezing of the crossing agreement.
Since June 2007 the people of Gaza have been effectively denied access
to the outside world both from Erez and Rafah crossings.

And Israel unilaterally canceled it anyway.

  • 6 votes
Reply#3 - Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:20 PM EST
IDFeb89

the zionists

I think you mean the Israelis. next you'll call Israel the Zionist entity...

It's a slippery slop from there, wheel.

Take care.

  • 5 votes
#3.1 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:50 PM EST
Wheel

I mean the zionists here on the vine. Not all of which are Israelis. Don't leap to unwarranted conclusions, It's a slippery slope.

Take care.

  • 4 votes
#3.2 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:46 PM EST
IDFeb89

Wheel,

Then perhaps a better term would be - Pro Israel viners.

Don't leap to unwarranted conclusions

Actually, I thought they were warranted enough for me to comment.

You could use the traffic anyway.

  • 3 votes
#3.3 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:57 PM EST
Wheel

I prefer zionists. Think about it for a minute and you might figure out why.

  • 4 votes
#3.4 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:07 PM EST
IDFeb89

I'm sure you do. however, that would be inaccurate.

  • 3 votes
#3.5 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:15 PM EST
Wheel

In what way? Are you saying all Israelis support the theft of Palestinian land? Are you saying all Israelis support collective punishment, mass murder and apartheid?

I think it's the zionists, fairly accurate after all.

  • 4 votes
#3.6 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:17 PM EST
IDFeb89

Are you saying all Israelis support the theft of Palestinian land? Are you saying all Israelis support collective punishment, mass murder and apartheid?

Come on, wheel. We did that two years ago or so...

I think it's wrong to generalize, whether you're speaking of Israelis, Pro Israel viners or Palestinians, Arabs for that matter.

I'm guessing you're fond of the term itself, and that's fine.

  • 3 votes
#3.7 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:25 PM EST
Wheel

So no then. Not all Israelis are zionists?

But all zionists support Israel's criminal policies re the Palestinians.

I'm saying the term is accurate.

But I do remember that zionists, from time to time, try to take control of the dialogue and define words to suit themselves.

Tell you what, instead of pro Israel, suppose we call them pro mass murder? Pro apartheid? Pro theft? Pro collective punishment? Ok?

You see, that includes people who support those Israeli policies but who aren't Israeli.

  • 5 votes
#3.8 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:35 PM EST
IDFeb89

wheel,

Tell you what, instead of pro Israel, suppose we call them pro mass murder? Pro apartheid? Pro theft? Pro collective punishment? Ok?

You see, that includes people who support those Israeli policies but who aren't Israeli.

Seriously?

Each to his own, I guess.

Just for the record - those possible IAF strikes tonight...a retaliation for the Grad rockets launched at Israel earlier tonight.

  • 3 votes
#3.9 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:40 PM EST
Wheel

But I do remember that zionists, from time to time, try to take control of the dialogue and define words to suit themselves.

Perhaps you don't remember the fight I had with Alki about this very thing.

Tell you what, instead of pro Israel, suppose we call them pro mass murder? Pro apartheid? Pro theft? Pro collective punishment? Ok?

You see, that includes people who support those Israeli policies but who aren't Israeli.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. As hard as it to believe, there are people who actually support Israel doing those things who aren't Israeli. A lot of them right here on the Vine.

  • 5 votes
#3.10 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:44 PM EST
IDFeb89

Yes, seriously. As hard as it to believe, there are people who actually support Israel doing those things who aren't Israeli. A lot of them right here on the Vine.

I hardly think they're Pro what you say they are.

Perhaps you don't remember the fight I had with Alki about this very thing.

I dont, no.

  • 2 votes
#3.11 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:52 PM EST
Wheel

I hardly think they're Pro what you say they are.

I'm not going to name people that aren't commenting here, but yeah, they are, rabidly so.

I dont, no.

Didn't miss much.

  • 4 votes
#3.12 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:06 PM EST
Meloney

the zionists so often try to cower behind the flaccid excuse that "Egypt is doing it too."

Yes, this excuse goes to the lack of context with which events are observed. There is pervasive denial of the influence which Israel has over the territories it occupies. It is an amazing tribute to the strength of hasbara that nearly every time Gaza is mentioned in the press it is accompanied by a phrase that reinforces the impression that Israel is powerless there (ie - "Hamas controlled", "Hamas ruled").

Another item covered in this report that has been an assumed truth by defenders of the occupation is that the blockade of Gaza is legal. The Israeli defense of the attack on the flotilla is based on this false assumption. The blockade is illegal therefore actions which extend or "defend" it are wrong.

  • 5 votes
#3.13 - Sun Feb 6, 2011 10:41 AM EST
Reply
Wintersnows

not trying to interrupt here, I am trying to find out if there is any information on the situation now since the stepping down ?? I thought there would be something about it on the vine, but so far I can't find anything.

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:53 AM EST
Meloney

hiya wintersnows - here's a Gaza Egypt border related thread.

It will be interesting to see the shape of changes to the extent that Egypt will continue to be complicit in the blockade of Gaza. Will the tunnel business be buried as the trade goes over ground?

  • 3 votes
#4.1 - Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:45 AM EST
Wheel

I truly hope that the changes in Egypt result in positive changes for the people of Gaza. I can't imagine any democratic govt that will continue the deliberate deprivation that Egypt practiced under Mubarak.

Meloney, thanks for the link. :)

  • 4 votes
#4.2 - Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:10 AM EST
Wintersnows

thanks

Hi Meloney and Wheel. I heard this morning (on tv) that they are hoping that the border into Gaza will be finally be under the control of the will of the Egyptian people on the Egyptian side, so that seems hopeful. I guess that Rafah really is on topic here too isn't it, and I guess that would be a really significant change.

  • 4 votes
#4.3 - Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:25 AM EST
Reply
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com